Table Of Contents
- Warmth 40%
- Comfort 10%
- Weight/Packed Size 40%
- Ease of Inflation 100%
- Durability 100%
Price: $45.95
Type: Closed-cell foam
Claimed R-value: 2
Weight: 14oz (396g)
Packed Volume: 9.2L
Thickness: 0.75″ (1.9cm)
LxW: 0.75″ (1.9cm)
Breaths to Inflate: N/A
What We Like: Inexpensive, Lightweight, Durable
What We Don’t: Large packed size, Minimal comfort
The Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL is a polarizing pad. There’s a lot to like about it, but it also has several notable drawbacks. At only $45.95, this closed-cell foam pad is the cheapest on our list. In fact, the price is reasonable enough that you’ll sometimes see this pad included as a complement to another pad to boost overall comfort and warmth; not only that, but using the closed-cell foam below an air-construction pad will protect the latter from potential punctures. However, if comfort is a major concern for you, then this may just be your very last choice. Still, many hikers who aren’t too picky about their degree of cushioning have come to love this light and durable pad.
Compare to Similar Products
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 90%
- Comfort 70%
- Weight/Packed Size 70%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 80%
Pros
Staggering warmth-to-weight ratio
Decent packed size
Cons
Very expensive
Overkill R-value for some
Slippery top
Type: Air Construction/Baffled Insulation
Claimed R-value: 6.9
Weight: 18.2oz (516g)
Packed Volume: 1.8L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 70%
- Comfort 60%
- Weight/Packed Size 80%
- Ease of Inflation 80%
- Durability 70%
Pros
Warm
Light
Highly Packable
Cons
A bit pricey
Slightly noisy
Type: Air Construction/Baffled Insulation
Claimed R-value: 4.2
Weight: 12.5oz (354g)
Packed Volume: 1.8L
Buy Now at Klymit.com
- Warmth 70%
- Comfort 70%
- Weight/Packed Size 70%
- Ease of Inflation 60%
- Durability 50%
Pros
Very warm
Great for side sleepers
Excellent packed size
Cons
The outer fabric could be more durable
Slow deflation time
Type: Air Construction/Synthetic Insulation
Claimed R-value: 4.4
Weight: 19.6oz (555g)
Packed Volume: 1L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 40%
- Comfort 20%
- Weight/Packed Size 40%
- Ease of Inflation 100%
- Durability 100%
Pros
Great price
Lightweight
Cons
Not as comfortable as an air pad
Not as packable as an air pad
Type: Closed-cell foam
Claimed R-value: 2
Weight: (411g)
Packed Volume: 9.2L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 40%
- Comfort 60%
- Weight/Packed Size 100%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 40%
Pros
Incredibly light
Small packed size
Cons
Pricey
Low R-value
Questionable durability
Type: Air Construction
Claimed R-value: 2.3
Weight: 8.8oz (249g)
Packed Volume: 0.9L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 20%
- Comfort 70%
- Weight/Packed Size 70%
- Ease of Inflation 60%
- Durability 80%
Pros
Small packed size
Impressive value
Reasonably comfortable
Cons
Low R-value
Slow deflation
Type: Air Construction
Claimed R-value: 1.3
Weight: 17.5oz (496g)
Packed Volume: 0.9L
Buy Now at REI.com
- Warmth 60%
- Comfort 80%
- Weight/Packed Size 80%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 40%
Pros
Comfortable
Easy inflation
Several sizes available
Cons
A bit pricey
The fabric could be sturdier
Type: Air Construction/Synthetic Insulation
Claimed R-value: 3.5
Weight: 15oz (425g)
Packed Volume: 1.2L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 60%
- Comfort 80%
- Weight/Packed Size 50%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 70%
Pros
Reasonable price
Warm
Cons
Large packed size
Long inflation time
Type: Self-Inflating
Claimed R-value: 3.2
Weight: 23oz (652g)
Packed Volume: 3.25L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 40%
- Comfort 10%
- Weight/Packed Size 40%
- Ease of Inflation 100%
- Durability 100%
Pros
Inexpensive
Lightweight
Durable
Cons
Large packed size
Minimal comfort
Type: Closed-cell foam
Claimed R-value: 2
Weight: 14oz (396g)
Packed Volume: 9.2L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 20%
- Comfort 50%
- Weight/Packed Size 90%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 60%
Pros
Small packed size
Excellent inflation system
Cons
Low R-value
Similarly priced pads with superior insulation
Type: Air Construction/AirSprung Cells
Claimed R-value: 1.1
Weight: 12.5oz (354g)
Packed Volume: 0.8L
Buy Now at Rei.com
- Warmth 70%
- Comfort 70%
- Weight/Packed Size 70%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 60%
Pros
Excellent inflation system
Good warmth-to-weight ratio
Cons
Pricey
Baffles collect dirt
Type: Air Construction/AirSprung Cells/Synthetic Insulation
Claimed R-value: 3.7
Weight: 20.5oz (581g)
Packed Volume: 1.6L
Buy Now at Nemoequipment.com
- Warmth 40%
- Comfort 80%
- Weight/Packed Size 50%
- Ease of Inflation 40%
- Durability 80%
Pros
Reasonable price
Comfortable
Built-in pillow
Cons
Large packed size
Slow inflation
Not very warm
Type: Air Construction/Synthetic Insulation
Claimed R-value: 2.6
Weight: 26oz (737g)
Packed Volume: 2L
Buy Now at Backcountry.com
- Warmth 70%
- Comfort 70%
- Weight/Packed Size 60%
- Ease of Inflation 70%
- Durability 80%
Pros
Appealing warmth-to-weight ratio
Comfortable
Included pump sack
Cons
Slightly heavy
Noisy
Type: Air Construction/Synthetic Insulation
Claimed R-value: 4.5
Weight: 22oz (623g)
Packed Volume: 1.7L
Buy Now at Rei.com
- Warmth 100%
- Comfort 90%
- Weight/Packed Size 20%
- Ease of Inflation 80%
- Durability 80%
Pros
Comfotable
Durable
Incredibly warm
Cons
Expensive
Heavy
Large packed size
Type: Air Construction/Baffled Insulation
Claimed R-value: 8
Weight: 31.2oz (884g)
Packed Volume: 4.8L
The Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL is a polarizing pad. There’s a lot to like about it, but it also has several notable drawbacks. At only $45.95, this closed-cell foam pad is the cheapest on our list. In fact, the price is reasonable enough that you’ll sometimes see this pad included as a complement to another pad to boost overall comfort and warmth; not only that, but using the closed-cell foam below an air-construction pad will protect the latter from potential punctures. However, if comfort is a significant concern for you, then this may just be your very last choice. Still, many hikers who aren’t too picky about their degree of cushioning have come to love this light and durable pad.
Warmth
The Z Lite SOL offers a reasonable degree of warmth, with a somewhat average R-value of 2 (previous versions of this pad claimed 2.6). It’s just warm enough to be considered a three-season pad but we certainly wouldn’t test the limits; more often than not, it’s used in conjunction with a packable air pad to boost the total R-value. One thing worth noting on this pad is its silver-colored reflective side; for optimal warmth on chilly nights, you’ll want to sleep with the reflective side up, while on warmer nights this should be on the bottom to keep yourself from getting too sweaty.
Comfort
At only 0.75″ (1.9cm) thick, the Z Lite SOL is the thinnest pad on our list; there’s no question that comfort is its most noteworthy weakness. On anything but the flattest ground, you’re sure to feel every nook and cranny. Quite simply, side sleepers and those who have trouble sleeping on the trail will be, to put it in Urban Dictionary terms, “SOL.” The pad has the typical dimensions of 72″x20″ (1.8m x 0.5m) but could also be cut down for those who only need the pad to cover the areas from their shoulder to their hips. For those who need just a bit more of a buffer between their body and the ground, the NEMO Switchback provides 0.9” while only costing $4 more. For everyone else, there’s simply no competition with the cushioning that you’ll get from an air pad.
Weight & Packed Size
At only 14oz (396g), the Z Lite SOL is undoubtedly appropriately named; it’s the fourth lightest pad on our list. Only the NEMO Switchback, the only other foam pad on our list, can offer the same essential weight at a similar price point. However, the Klymit Static V2 weighs only 17.5oz, albeit at $20 more, and packs down significantly smaller than the Z Lite SOL.
On the topic of packed size, the Z Lite SOL has a compressed volume of approximately 9.2L. However, it’s unlikely that anyone will attempt to stuff this inside their bag. Instead, it will be folded down accordion-style to dimensions of 20”x5”x5.5” (51cm x 13cm x 14cm) and either strapped to the outside of the bag, or in some cases, used as the back panel for a frameless ultralight backpack. As with all foam pads, those who truly don’t concern themselves over comfort and would prefer to reduce weight and packed size can cut out some of the pad’s panels. You can also save yourself some of the DIY work by simply purchasing the smaller version, which has the same width but is only 51” long; this weighs only 10oz and will actually save you $10.
Inflation
In case you haven’t already guessed, inflation is a non-issue with foam pads. You’ll be saving yourself quite a bit of heavy breathing by opting for the Z Lite SOL rather than an inflatable pad. Just unroll it, and you’re all set! One of the great reliefs of pads like the Z Lite SOL is that it’s one less task to complete when you finally reach your campsite. It even provides a quick seat for you to give your feet a rest while you sort through your backpack for all the other essentials.
Durability
The Z Lite Sol utilizes a crosslinked polyethylene fill that’s softer on top and denser on the bottom. Much like ease of inflation, durability is a category where foam pads will always come out on top (no repair kit needed). While foam pads like the Z Lite SOL are by no means impervious to the occasional scrape and missing chunk, they are still, for all intents and purposes, indestructible, considering that they will still function as intended even with a considerable degree of damage. When the day finally comes that it’s time to replace your pad, it’s comforting to know that it won’t take a big chunk from your bank account.
The Bottom Line
If you’re forming a list of economical sleeping pads, it would be foolish to exclude the Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL, which offers a great deal of value at a very reasonable price. As an inexpensive sleep system, it’s very popular amongst those who don’t put too much concern into comfort. It makes for a great addition to an inflatable pad when you’re looking to boost your comfort and your R-value. However, at only $4 more, the NEMO Switchback provides slightly more cushioning and is only 0.5oz heavier, so if this will be your only pad, that’s probably the one we would choose.
Compare Prices From Retailers Below
You help support Gear Hacker by purchasing from our retail partners.